Facebook Running Out Of Cash? Good!

|

FacebookStarbucks.jpgSome say Facebook is running out of cash. Good. Maybe now the social network will buckle down and take some of the money Madison Avenue wants to throw its way in order to reach the site's 120 million active users.

This week, for example, Starbucks paid to use a modified version of Facebook's calendar tool to promise US users free coffee if they vote. That kind of "branded experience" is a sign that Facebook might finally be finding ways to use its assets in a way few other sites can.

The problem with Facebook, after all, hasn't been advertiser demand, it's been the site's inability to supply marketers a compelling advertising product.

Since the Beacon fiasco, Facebook has tried to sell brand advertisers on a Google-esque automated ad buying process--in part because investors expect Facebook to eventually turn in Google-esque revenues.

Facebook won't produce these revenues, and it's unlikely that Facebook will be able to automate the sales process. But a top interactive agency exec told me last month that Facebook could make more than a few bucks -- think primetime ad rates -- selling what Madison Avenue likes to call "branded experiences":

Facebook needs to come up with ways for advertisers to be seen as providing new functionality on Facebook itself. By way of analogy, my source told me to imagine American Express sponsoring a normally congested toll road for a day. Drivers approaching the toll booths would see them empty and maybe billboard that read: "No toll today. Drive on through and see what it's like to be an American Express cardholder." Facebook should encourage users to feel like a site improvement was brought to them by a brand. Maybe Facebook's Video application should have been sponsored by Sony's CyberShot line, for example.

(Screenshot by AllFacebook)

See Also:
Facebook: TechCrunch Nuts, We Have Plenty of Cash

Why Is Facebook Burning So Much Cash? They Keep Hiring

Facebook Hemorrhaging Cash, Runs To Dubai For Money



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

14 Comments

geewhiz said:
If true, it would take a very strong, charismatic leader to pull Facebook through a recession AND a "down" funding round without them losing significant talent. I don't see Zuckerburg as being that person.
Migukin (URL) said:
Why is it so dang hard for Facebook to realize that it's not an advertising venue, it's a value-added market generator?

It would be so simple to either a) start up it's on eBay-type offering, b) do some sort of widget deal with eBay or c) (not as easy) merge with eBay and make the experience seamless (and get Skype a seamless experience for it's users as well.

Here's how it would work: I want to sell something. I post my eBay-like ad on Facebook and everyone I know who is interested in said product would get a headsup in a seamless, non-annoying manner.

They could also make a lot of money if they were to start having a tagging feature on their photos like Flickr and then sell ads (or even the photos themselves).

I still think that Facebook should get over itself and figure out a way to merge with AOL and start to intergrate all the AOL stuff directly into Facebook. Facebook is a bunch of 23-year-olds and maybe they need to take a deep breath and realize life sucks and sometimes you have to do something that's not "cool."
happyhappy said:
they have the share, they have the momentum, users have invested the time to build the social graph, time to start charging $10/year.
Clyde McPhat said:
Why is the site in question always responsible for coming up with the great idea that will work with advertisers? Why don't the ad agencies who work for the big clients come up with the WORKABLE big ideas for Facebook. Then if facebook turned them down, we would know they aren't interested in being an advertising vehicle. Let's not expect the builders of the site to have the answers for the advertising community. Let's have the advertising community actually do their fucking jobs.
M. McMahon (URL) said:
Fundamentally, Facebook is about communication, not commerce. They should position themselves as the future of all personal communications - web sharing, email, IM, VOIP, video VOIP, etc. and relentlessly pursue communications excellence. Their permission-based communications will ensure no direct mail, telemarketers, etc. can get through which is a huge benefit. They are already almost there. Their elegant combination of passive communication (status, feeds, etc.) and active communication (email, phone, IM) are perfectly tuned for the current and future forms of local and global communication. So... How about a deal to acquire Skype to jump start monetization of their 'active' communication services?
Clyde McPhat said:
That Skype idea is brilliant...I hear a lot of people on the street talking about Skype in the same vein as IPOD's....Dear. Mr. McMahon, I think your Skype idea is so shockingly stupid....I think EBAY already paid for their ignorance once on Skype...if Facebook acquired Skype for FREE they would still be overpaying.
geewhiz said:
Not to mention the fact that Facebook has no money!
wizard said:
Facebook first needs to find a contextual advertisement technology provider which actually works at showing proper and relevant ads to users.
@Wizard, no, Facebook does not. In fact, they should stop taking ads from MSFT as soon as possible. Yeesh.
Freddy said:
Have you people even heard of the 'INTERNET'? Why does everything have to be done through fricken Facebook. To flip through page after page of Facebook, you may as well be on the internet.
MK (Casey) van Bronkhorst (URL) said:
Each time I visit my account at Facebook, I'm amazed at how much more difficult it is becoming to find anything, to reach people, to wade through the tons of noise and 'permission-based' intrusive game and gift applications to get anything done.


If they do get funding, I sincerely hope they invest it into developing a rational user interface. I'd even tolerate a certain amount of adware noise if that's what it takes for them to return to a state of usability.
John Who said:
who needs Facebook anyway? go get a life and let them starve. they deserve it.
Anthony Bain (URL) said:
facebook being one of the first of its kind like all pioneers will soon be superceeded by others taking advantage of the oppurtunities that they failed to.

Lurking behond the next quarter is a social networking site that will really put the cat amongst the pigeons, in fact its gone behond the catergory of social networking to more of a social habitat.

No more clues but when you start to hear'Whay hay' CaChing' and 'Oh la la' the beast will be climbing to sit in its throne to rule the jungle and will for a long time to come.

Bainzy.
Datinger (URL) said:
Anyone can build a social networking site these days. It's important what you bring new to stay ahead of competition.

Join the discussion