RIM Downgraded On Risky Smartphone Land Grab, Crappy Economy

|

new-blackberries.jpgBlackBerry maker Research In Motion (RIMM) shocked the market yesterday, sending shares down 20% after hours -- now down 25% this morning in high-volume trading -- when it said gross margins would decline next quarter and next year as the company invests to steal share in the rapidly growing smartphone market.

Not a stupid decision, but a risky one. Deutsche Bank downgraded RIM to "sell" and RBC to "sector perform" this morning, while Credit Suisse upgraded RIM to "neutral."

The one note of the three we've seen today: RBC's downgrade, in which analyst Mike Abramsky cuts RIM's price target to $90 from $165. Why?

  • Less visibility to recovering margins -- RIM guided margins in the mid-40% range, while analysts were looking for something around 50%. Who knows when they're going to go up again -- if ever?
  • Increased risks to RIM's growth from the crappy economy.

The bottom line: It's probably not a bad move for RIM as a company to invest in the "land grab" and grow its huge market share in the booming smartphone market. But as a stock, RIM is now riskier -- especially if RIM has to fend off similar 'land grabs' from competitors like Apple, Google, Microsoft, or whomever.

Remember what happened to Motorola when it went after market share -- instead of profit -- by helping carriers cut the RAZR's price tag to zero? Not good.

The big differences here: RIM's model is part subscription-based; handset sales aren't their only source or revenue, so subsidizing phones to get more email subscribers isn't a total loss. And this is a platform play, not just a gadget play -- so if RIM can take an early lead and hook people on the BlackBerry platform, it's likely people will keep buying BlackBerries. Whereas previous RAZR owners really have no reason to buy another RAZR, unless they just want another cheap phone.

Earlier: RIM Blows Q2; Subscriber, EPS Guidance Weak; Shares Topple



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

8 Comments

Joe said:
[i]The big differences here: RIM's model is part subscription-based; handset sales aren't their only source or revenue, so subsidizing phones to get more email subscribers isn't a total loss. And this is a platform play, not just a gadget play -- so if RIM can take an early lead and hook people on the BlackBerry platform, it's likely people will keep buying BlackBerries. Whereas previous RAZR owners really have no reason to buy another RAZR, unless they just want another cheap phone. [/i]

$10/month for Blackberry email service just for the "push" service? Why would a consumer need this crap? Wait till that goes away as more consumers stay away from B'berry to avoid this $10/month crap fee. And anyway Gmail allows POP3, windows mobile comes preset with Gmail POP settings for the "Push" service. The only reason Pearl sold well was there were *NO* alternatives or worse yet, ugly alternatives like RAZR and various clamshell phones from samsung, lg etc (all at similar price points). Now the arena is way different - lots of nice, touchscreen smartphones which do the job and RIM is yet to launch a touchscreen. They are too late to the game....
Joe said:
oh by the way: platform is nice and stuff. But smartphones aint PC - average consumer holds on to PC for 4-5 years. makes sense if Microsoft or someone else wants to land grab in PC arena as discounting now gives a good amount of time to sell additional packages. But, average contract period for smartphones (in US) - less than 2 years. After that, no brand loyalty - go after the phone which is cheap and has nice features.
EPS said:
You know, anyone who talks about a "winner" here I think isn't thinking- no one player is likely to get Windows-like dominance over the smartphone space- it's like asking who's going to "win" the console wars. Sony does well one generation, but the next generation Nintendo comes out of nowhere, and so on.

RIMM is doing what's necessary to survive, but the new situation isn't as conducive to making money as their old situation was, so I guess the downgrade is warranted.
Tim F. said:
Isn't the "land grab" about developing phones that look competitive with the iPhone rather than looking like the same Blackberry you've had for the last 5 years (yeah, RIM's hardware is good and always gets better, but the basic form factor has remained relatively unchanged.) So the "land grab" may seem ill-timed in a bad economy, but it's not like they have any choice. They don't want to be like Microsoft and be more than a year and a half behind the iPhone.
dj said:
Wow miss by .004% an get killed 25% ,this could get real ugly after AAPL spills
KenC said:
@dj, it wasn't the small miss that killed the stock, it was the forecast.

Join the discussion