Everybody's Underwater In Silicon Valley

|

UnderwaterOptions.jpgAs tech stocks plummet, more Silicon Valley workers find themselves holding worthless options -- the kind that would allow them to buy company stock at higher prices than they are currently being publicly traded.

They're "underwater."

As of October 24, more than 80% of Silicon Valley's 150 largest publicly traded companies have employees holding underwater options, according to executive compensation research firm Equilar. CEOs at 90% of those companies also held options worth less than their strike price.

At Google, fully a third of the company's 20,000 employees hold underwater options. Last month, Google (GOOG) sought to soothe anxious employees with an internal employee-compensation presentation, reminding them that their Transferable Stock Options are worth more than regular options.

One Yahoo exec told the Wall Street Journal: "Anyone who's been hired after I was hired, all those people are underwater." Chipmaker AMD (AMD) plans to ask shareholders permission to lower the strike price 99% of its outstanding options.

When stock prices drop, investors typically balk at allowing companies to reprice employee options. But in the Valley, options are an elemental part of employee compensation. And investors sound amenable, according to the Journal:

RiskMetrics' Mr. McGurn said investors will be much more sympathetic to plans that don't include executives and directors, many of whom are seen as overpaid. Shareholders also may want to see vesting schedules, the length of time employees have to work at a company before getting their grants, extended in order to entice employees to stay longer.

"I would probably lean toward [repricing] if it would help keep employees," said Ryan Jacob, chief investment officer at Jacob Asset Management, which holds shares in many major technology companies, including Google, Apple (AAPL) and Yahoo (YHOO).

See Also:
Dear Investors And Portfolio Companies: We're Broke

Facebook's Gideon Yu Back From Middle East Cash-Raising Trip?

Photo: Alex Campos



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

14 Comments

Dean Wermer said:
Well, sure, many of these companies have been swept up in the general market collapse; however, some companies have suffered from poor management, bad strategic decisions and the like (I'm looking at you Yahoo). Hard to see why across-the-board option re-pricing (rather than adoption of more selective plans to incentivize employees) should be adopted in the latter case.
Thanks said:
"As of October 24, more than 80% of Silicon Valley's 150 largest publicly traded companies have employees holding underwater options..."

The market is getting hammered. It's a surprise that 80% of Silicon Valley companies have at least one employee with options that are underwater? Don't need a research company to tell me that.
United Welfare States of America (URL) said:
Why would anyone balk at resetting the strike prices to $0? I mean why should anyone have to actually be held accountable for their decisions anymore. We should all get free hand outs regardless of how hard we work or our level of success. When in doubt, blame someone else, blame the government, blame wall street, and hold out your hand. That's the new American way!
Dean said:
Can't wait for the ATM to kick in on this. Underwater, but they still have value on paper, and when the tax man cometh (and he will after Jan 20th, with a vengeance), it'll be time to pay.
reprice why said:
this is just the type of moral hazard we want to avoid. what's the point of repricing options, where are the underwater employees going to go?? look around, everyone is hurting.
AB Baby said:
Most Adobe employees are also underwater, esp the new exec team, who are heard to be quite unhappy these days. with a 10% layoff coming at the end of the month, morale will be at its lowest point ever.
@AB Baby, send me more information about Adobe layoffs and underwater options? It's Nicholas@alleyinsider.com or tips@alleyinsider.com
Dave Zatz (URL) said:
I'd rather be underwater, than unemployed.
KiasuChick said:
Haha, I left Yahoo! for 5 months last year. Came back, receiving options for $10 less than my old ones. Thought I scored big time.

Nope. Worthless again, just like the old ones!

Gotta love it. A company encourages one to take a risk that will provide incentive for hard work. Then, the employee bitches when he doesn't benefit. Do these people not grasp the concept of "risk"?
TomC said:
Doesn't make much sense for an existing shareholder who bought shares at a higher price to grant employees the right to reprice options to a lower price. If employees are confident of the future success of their employer, they should do what investors do and buy shares on the open market and wait for their old options to float above water. Otherwise, employees should lobby for a higher salary and leave equity to those with a long term perspective and stomach for risk. Repricing options for employees is a sign to existing investors that companies are not sincere about shareholder value and that investors are better served buying shares in companies/industries that do not engage in such practices.
CB said:
People say they want capitalism but can never stomach the risk involved. They complain about taxes and welfare but are never averse to changing the rules to collect on a something that they don't deserve. Face it...this is an entitlement nation from top to bottom. Nothing worse than hypocrits who collect benefits in a socialistic manner (like repricing) and then become staunch capitalists when the tax man cometh. Everyone loses when there is no consequence or suffering in making erroneous/bad decisions...and here we are.
davidwao ao (URL) said:
Tiffany jewellery
He added that he thought there were still opportunities for some kind of partnership around search.
We don't think Steve is bluffing. We think he really has moved on. But we also note that this is Steve Ballmer we're talking about: He could always just wake up one morning and change his mind.
ga2viwedao (URL) said:
Tiffany rings He added that he thought there were still opportunities for some kind of partnership around search.
We don't think Steve is bluffing. We think he really has moved on. But we also note that this is Steve Ballmer we're talking about: He could always just wake up one morning and change his mind.

Join the discussion