Twitter's Redesign: New Look, No Search?

|

twitter logo.pngWhen Twitter bought search engine Summize this year for $15 million, we convinced ourselves that the deal could make sense, and might even provide the microblog with a way to make money. We still think that could happen, but we're a little less sold now that we've seen Twitter's new redesign. User's home pages now look just a bit different -- except instead of using Twitter's old, pre-Summize search box, they now don't feature any search box at all.

Our guess: Some kind of search, presmuably powered by the company Twitter just spent $15 million on, will eventually resurface on the page. Presumably on one of the right-hand tabs cofounder Ev Williams talks about on his blog post which semi-explains the changes. But until then, Twitter users who want to search for anyone or anything are left with no options, unless they know enough to type "Summize" into their browser bar. That can't possibly be what the company has in mind, right?

UPDATE: "They're working on it," Tweets Bijan Sabet, whose Spark Capital has invested in Twitter. "We all want it."

See Also: Twitter Buys Summize For $15 Million. Gets Search - And Maybe A Business Model



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

11 Comments

Jeff Crites (URL) said:
That was the first thing I noticed, and the most frustrating part of the change. I came home from a huge party (Twin Tech 2) in DC last night, wanted to do a Twitter search for some folks I met, had their biz cards ... and sat befuddled, looking at the new interface. They must know how important that feature is. But why not include the old version until the new one comes into play? Poor decision making.
I welcome any changes & additions to Twitter, and I am probably one of their biggest fans. Having said that, I still believe the Twexecutives in charge still don't get it. I blogged a while back how what they really need to do is not their back-end (ya, I know how important that is as well), nor is it about moving the tabs (their redesign is a nice addition to their UI).

There are still too many people who come to Twitter because of all their great buzz, and Twitter just wastes the opportunity. They more often then not come away with that "I don't get it" comment, and never come back. Twitter could in one day, and with little resources simply post some tutorials, and explanatory pages to educate newbies. This would be the biggest ROI they could ever invest in. Hell, I don't even work for them, and I have already blogged over a dozen ways that Tweeple, and businesses use Twitter differently.

www.twitter.com/A_F
LinkedIn not displaying and enabling email is a sham.
bijan sabet (URL) said:
@andyfinkle

glad you are a twitter fan. I am too :)

this new design is just one step forward to allow multiple things to flow in and out of it. more things are coming to make it easier to understand, easier to use, easier to search. oh and new things too.

please keep the feedback coming.

thanks.

-bijan

(disclosure: i'm an investor in twitter)
If Twitter plans on having search available in the future, they should have waited until then to update the site.

It’s really limiting going from page to page, especially when they’re site’s slow to begin with.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something but Twitter has search. http://search.twitter.com/

It works great and if you don't want to go through the hassle of going to that page all the time you can put twitter search on your firefox search bar.
George said:
And yet Twitter still fails to go mainstream. The echo chamber continues the circle jerk.
Bill Greenberg - Good Computer Guy (URL) said:
I'm one of those guys who still "doesn't get it" but I'm still pursuing it, hoping I'll "get it" one day. Not holding my breath though. But Twitter is definitely NOT helping themselves - their own little video just shows how Twitter answers the question "what are you doing?" My response is "what do I care?" Do people really read through all the thousands of posts about adding cream to coffee, etc?
MisterMakeItHappen (URL) said:
The Twitter Commandments; http://tinyurl.com/3rhtwp

Join the discussion