<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Freakonomics</title><link>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com</link><description>New York Times Blog</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:17:56 PDT</lastBuildDate><generator>WordPress http://wordpress.org/</generator><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/?feed=rss2" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/?feed=rss2" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><item><title>Loneliness or Cheap Wine</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/nvv2sO0wi-U/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>supply and demand</category><category>wine</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Daniel Hamermesh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:17:56 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14815</guid><description>I'm alone in Europe, living in an apartment and cooking for myself. I bought a bottle of decent red wine for the remarkably low price of €2.99 and am consuming about one-fourth of it with each dinner (instead of the one-fifth or one-sixth of a bottle I would drink with each dinner at home).  

Have I substituted toward wine, moving down the demand curve because the price is lower than at home? Or am I drinking more because I am alone and miss my wife? has my demand curve for wine merely shifted out due to my solitary lifestyle?
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JRCvukKcln5G0Oz5bv1kTouXvtQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JRCvukKcln5G0Oz5bv1kTouXvtQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JRCvukKcln5G0Oz5bv1kTouXvtQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JRCvukKcln5G0Oz5bv1kTouXvtQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/nvv2sO0wi-U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">57</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/loneliness-or-cheap-wine/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Polling: What's the Point?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/A83BebEXjEw/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>polls</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:29:08 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14819</guid><description>&lt;strong&gt;Conor Clarke&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://ideas.theatlantic.com/2009/07/get_rid_of_polls.php"&gt;suggests&lt;/a&gt; removing polls from the American political process. Not only are poll results frequently wrong, he argues, but polling "uncomfortably expands the domain of democracy."
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/MwE_49PAiGzrFpF4HEXNvoPN1Rg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/MwE_49PAiGzrFpF4HEXNvoPN1Rg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/MwE_49PAiGzrFpF4HEXNvoPN1Rg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/MwE_49PAiGzrFpF4HEXNvoPN1Rg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/A83BebEXjEw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">18</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/polling-whats-the-point/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>When Credit Card Companies Compete, You Win</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/2wnuYBL4eds/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>credit</category><category>law</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Ian Ayres</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:43:52 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14809</guid><description>&lt;strong&gt;Barry Nalebuff&lt;/strong&gt; and I have a new column in &lt;em&gt;Forbes&lt;/em&gt; ("&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0713/opinions-market-credit-cards-why-not.html"&gt;A Market Test for Credit Cards&lt;/a&gt;") which criticizes some aspects of the recent &lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/05/credit_card_legislation_become.html"&gt;credit-card legislation&lt;/a&gt; as being too anti-market.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/WPDWvGwS-KYD88IFT9A3cS93MCM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/WPDWvGwS-KYD88IFT9A3cS93MCM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/WPDWvGwS-KYD88IFT9A3cS93MCM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/WPDWvGwS-KYD88IFT9A3cS93MCM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/2wnuYBL4eds" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">16</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/when-credit-card-companies-compete-you-win/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>At Least the French Are Honest</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/vPiyeSCVkO4/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>quote</category><category>Sports</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Steven D. Levitt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:11:10 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14823</guid><description>After winning a stage of the Tour de France, Frenchman &lt;strong&gt;Thomas
Voeckler&lt;/strong&gt; was quoted as saying,
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/eqzAfbq1G89IVl3rJA-toL5SYPI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/eqzAfbq1G89IVl3rJA-toL5SYPI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/eqzAfbq1G89IVl3rJA-toL5SYPI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/eqzAfbq1G89IVl3rJA-toL5SYPI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/vPiyeSCVkO4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">20</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/at-least-the-french-are-honest/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Looking for Someone to Blame?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/urFExoTOBFg/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:54:15 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14805</guid><description>In an article headlined "&lt;a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/aig200908?currentPage=1"&gt;The Man Who Crashed the World&lt;/a&gt;" &lt;a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/michael-lewis/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Michael Lewis&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; profiles &lt;strong&gt;Joe Cassano&lt;/strong&gt;, the former head of A.I.G.'s Financial Products unit. Lewis &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/25/opinion/25desantis.html"&gt;interviewed employees&lt;/a&gt; at the beleaguered F.P. unit and writes that most believed that "if it hadn't been for A.I.G. F.P. the subprime-mortgage machine might never have been built, and the financial crisis might never have happened."
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0yRajdK2RQfj4vDwa6KiMSgoCtE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0yRajdK2RQfj4vDwa6KiMSgoCtE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0yRajdK2RQfj4vDwa6KiMSgoCtE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0yRajdK2RQfj4vDwa6KiMSgoCtE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/urFExoTOBFg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">13</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/looking-for-someone-to-blame/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Quotes Uncovered: Brides and Fruit Flies</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/tsiEnvlMZoI/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>fred shapiro</category><category>quote</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Fred Shapiro</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:09:28 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14631</guid><description>A while back,  I invited readers to submit quotations for which they wanted me to try to trace the origins, using &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Yale-Book-Quotations-Fred-Shapiro/dp/0300107986"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Yale Book of Quotations&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and more recent research by me. Hundreds of people have responded via comments or e-mails. I am responding as best I can, a few per week.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/BfqNtsTNW5It5KfjgHhE7x2VfxM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/BfqNtsTNW5It5KfjgHhE7x2VfxM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/BfqNtsTNW5It5KfjgHhE7x2VfxM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/BfqNtsTNW5It5KfjgHhE7x2VfxM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/tsiEnvlMZoI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">18</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/quotes-uncovered-brides-and-fruit-flies/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>"Family Values" and the Law: A Guest Post</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/HIQztI0aTn0/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>family</category><category>law</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Stephen J. Dubner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:32:48 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14209</guid><description>We previously featured &lt;a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/author/ethan-leib/"&gt;some compelling guest posts&lt;/a&gt; by the legal scholar &lt;a href="http://www.law.columbia.edu/fac/Ethan_Leib"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ethan Leib&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; on the subject of friendship and the law. Now he is back, along with his two co-authors on a new book called &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Privilege-Punish-Criminal-Justice-Challenge/dp/0195380061/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;#038;s=books&amp;#038;qid=1241674553&amp;#038;sr=1-1"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Privilege or Punish: Criminal Justice and the Challenge of Family Ties&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. This is their first of three posts.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/S2DKiGvtz_EzCQO_fKwUBhF3IOo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/S2DKiGvtz_EzCQO_fKwUBhF3IOo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/S2DKiGvtz_EzCQO_fKwUBhF3IOo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/S2DKiGvtz_EzCQO_fKwUBhF3IOo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/HIQztI0aTn0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">17</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/family-values-and-the-law-a-guest-post/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Would You Pay More ...</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/WUmXy8m3AqU/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>ebay</category><category>price theory</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:16:19 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14709</guid><description>... for a Sanka ashtray if &lt;strong&gt;Luc Sante&lt;/strong&gt; made up a story about it? Apparently at least a few people would, as &lt;strong&gt;Joshua Glenn&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Rob Walker&lt;/strong&gt; found when they launched a project called &lt;a href="http://significantobjects.com/"&gt;Significant Objects&lt;/a&gt;, where they paired up creative writers with objects bought at garage sales and asked them to make up a story about the objects. Each object is for sale on eBay, where anyone can bid for it.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SYTrf1qh8nsX4WtcybLqWVEFln4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SYTrf1qh8nsX4WtcybLqWVEFln4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SYTrf1qh8nsX4WtcybLqWVEFln4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SYTrf1qh8nsX4WtcybLqWVEFln4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/WUmXy8m3AqU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">13</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/would-you-pay-more/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A SuperFreakonomics Counting Contest</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/ccaOTWV-fUI/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>contest</category><category>schwag</category><category>SuperFreakonomics</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Stephen J. Dubner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:05:50 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14717</guid><description>The mother of all deadlines fast approaches: our new book, &lt;em&gt;SuperFreakonomics&lt;/em&gt;, is due to be published on October 20. In the meantime, how about a little contest?

Think of it as a guess-the-number-of-jelly-beans-in-a-jar contest except in this case the jar is infinitely expandable, and the jelly beans don't yet exist.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Lazzx18yx0LVgYKZFTFFgqJxu7o/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Lazzx18yx0LVgYKZFTFFgqJxu7o/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Lazzx18yx0LVgYKZFTFFgqJxu7o/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Lazzx18yx0LVgYKZFTFFgqJxu7o/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/ccaOTWV-fUI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">679</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/a-superfreakonomics-counting-contest/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Shopping for Gamblers</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/Iixt5_h2Fdk/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Behavioral Economics</category><category>gambling</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:38:34 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14689</guid><description>How can &lt;a href="http://www.swoopo.com/new.html"&gt;Swoopo&lt;/a&gt;, the online auction site, rake in $2,151 selling a laptop for $35.86? Easy: set an opening price of $0.01 (almost &lt;a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/is-free-free/"&gt;free&lt;/a&gt;!), then let each new bidder top the last by only a penny, and extend the auction each time someone places a bid in the final seconds. Oh, and collect $0.60 from each player for each bid they place. The winner of the auction might walk away with a good deal, but the losers will have racked up big fees chasing their sunk costs.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/y0P_LZDwqQHHxraeN4wdiEWOhFU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/y0P_LZDwqQHHxraeN4wdiEWOhFU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/y0P_LZDwqQHHxraeN4wdiEWOhFU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/y0P_LZDwqQHHxraeN4wdiEWOhFU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/Iixt5_h2Fdk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">23</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/shopping-for-gamblers/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Track Your Taxes</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/KW1TEfmz_pk/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:42:06 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14435</guid><description>Concerned citizens can now track government spending at USASpending.gov. Users can view current and historical spending on contracts, grants, and loans, broken down by characteristics like congressional district and contractor. The website, mandated by the Federal Funding and Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, is a revamped version of fedspending.org. Warning: if you're a pacifist, &lt;a href="http://www.usaspending.gov/fpds/tables.php?tabtype=t2&amp;#038;subtype=t&amp;#038;year=2009"&gt;steer clear&lt;/a&gt;, or at least keep your blood-pressure pills at hand.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0Tf5M5cdzV4cPelIULNOqvkivWM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0Tf5M5cdzV4cPelIULNOqvkivWM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0Tf5M5cdzV4cPelIULNOqvkivWM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/0Tf5M5cdzV4cPelIULNOqvkivWM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/KW1TEfmz_pk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">13</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/track-your-taxes/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Man vs. Machine on Jeopardy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/0mGNxpeNVsI/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>computers</category><category>games</category><category>television</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Steven D. Levitt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:46:19 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14559</guid><description>IBM researchers are hard at work creating a computer that will match wits against humans on the television show &lt;em&gt;Jeopardy&lt;/em&gt;. Compared to checkers, chess, or backgammon, playing &lt;em&gt;Jeopardy&lt;/em&gt; would seem to be a hard task for a computer because language is such a fundamental part of answering the questions correctly.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/6L3X94HsbjPZRWqvSdTS8GUVf6Y/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/6L3X94HsbjPZRWqvSdTS8GUVf6Y/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/6L3X94HsbjPZRWqvSdTS8GUVf6Y/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/6L3X94HsbjPZRWqvSdTS8GUVf6Y/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/0mGNxpeNVsI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">9</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/man-vs-machine-on-jeopardy/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Domo Arigato Missus Krugman</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/CveHJF24E-U/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>economists</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>women</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:30:50 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14353</guid><description>&lt;em&gt;Slate&lt;/em&gt; columnist &lt;strong&gt;Daniel Gross&lt;/strong&gt; thinks he's &lt;a href=" http://www.slate.com/id/2221974/"&gt;found the female embodiment of &lt;strong&gt;Paul Krugman&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; in Japanese economist &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiVR0XE1Qtg"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Noriko Hama&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lLrzQhixh19dEAG6NyWZ0bITMH0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lLrzQhixh19dEAG6NyWZ0bITMH0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lLrzQhixh19dEAG6NyWZ0bITMH0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lLrzQhixh19dEAG6NyWZ0bITMH0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/CveHJF24E-U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/domo-arigato-missus-krugman/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Nanny Nation</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/Eh-j1UN319k/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Barry Ritholtz</category><category>book</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Dwyer Gunn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:16:36 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14621</guid><description>&lt;strong&gt;Barry Ritholtz&lt;/strong&gt;, in his new book &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Bailout-Nation-Corrupted-Street-Economy/dp/0470520388/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;#038;s=books&amp;#038;qid=1246556404&amp;#038;sr=8-1"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bailout Nation: How Greed and Easy Money Corrupted Wall Street and Shook the World Economy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; writes, "The iconic image is the American cowboy. You can picture him on a cattle drive, wearily watching over his herd. All he needed to get by were his wits, his horse -- and his trusty Winchester."
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/FsLTXBohv5BJI7NAgfVJ706-3TQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/FsLTXBohv5BJI7NAgfVJ706-3TQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/FsLTXBohv5BJI7NAgfVJ706-3TQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/FsLTXBohv5BJI7NAgfVJ706-3TQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/Eh-j1UN319k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">61</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/the-nanny-nation/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>FREAK Shots: Bird Critics</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/bQHVIek2TwQ/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>animals</category><category>art</category><category>photography</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:49:01 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14611</guid><description>A &lt;a href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1711791/pigeons_interpret_beauty_in_same_way_as_humans/"&gt;new study&lt;/a&gt; by a research team from Tokyo's Keio University found that pigeons can distinguish between paintings the researchers consider good and bad.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/3FSq83tgn6EMBO-OIQZSyl0cVSg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/3FSq83tgn6EMBO-OIQZSyl0cVSg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/3FSq83tgn6EMBO-OIQZSyl0cVSg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/3FSq83tgn6EMBO-OIQZSyl0cVSg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/bQHVIek2TwQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">10</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/freak-shots-bird-critics/</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
